Android进阶事件分发机制解决事件冲突
作者：layz4android
引言
相信伙伴们在日常的开发工作中，一定会遇到事件冲突的问题，e.g. 一个页面当手指滑动的时候，会翻到下一页；点击的时候，需要响应页面中的元素点击事件，这个时候如果没有处理滑动事件，可能遇到的问题就是在滑动翻页的时候却只响应了点击事件，这个就是点击事件与滑动事件的冲突。其实还有很多常见的经典事件，e.g. RecyclerView嵌套滑动，ViewPager与RecyclerView嵌套滑动等，所以这个时候我们需要对事件分发非常了解，才能针对需求做相应的处理。
1 Android 事件分发机制
这是一个老生常谈的问题，相信伙伴们都了解常见的Android事件类型：ACTION_DOWN、ACTION_MOVE、ACTION_UP，分别代表手指按下屏幕的事件、手指滑动的事件以及手指抬起的事件，那么从手指按下到事件响应，中间经历了什么呢？我们从Google的源码中去寻找答案。
1.1 事件分发流程
因为对于组件来说，这个事件要么消费要么不消费（事件处理），而对于容器来说，还需要做的一件事就是分发事件，通常是先分发后处理，而View就只是处理事件。
因此在进行事件冲突处理的时候，对于事件是否向下分发给子View消费，就需要在父容器中做拦截，子View仅做事件消费。
1.2 View的事件消费
首先我们先不看事件是如何分发的，先关注下事件是如何被处理的，在View的dispatchTouchEvent方法中，就包含对事件的处理全过程。
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
//......
boolean result = false;
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(event, 0);
}
final int actionMasked = event.getActionMasked();
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Defensive cleanup for new gesture
stopNestedScroll();
}
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(event)) {
if ((mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED && handleScrollBarDragging(event)) {
result = true;
}
//核心代码1
ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnTouchListener != null
&& (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED
&& li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {
result = true;
}
//核心代码2
if (!result && onTouchEvent(event)) {
result = true;
}
}
if (!result && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(event, 0);
}
// Clean up after nested scrolls if this is the end of a gesture;
// also cancel it if we tried an ACTION_DOWN but we didn't want the rest
// of the gesture.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP ||
actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL ||
(actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN && !result)) {
stopNestedScroll();
}
return result;
}
看到dispatchTouchEvent，我们可能会想，这个方法名看着像是分发事件的方法，View不是仅仅消费事件吗，还需要处理分发？其实不是这样的，因为View对于事件可以有选择的，可以选择不处理事件，那么就会往上派给父类去处理这个事件，如果能够消费，那么就在onTouchEvent中处理了。
核心代码1：首先拿到一个ListenerInfo对象，这个对象中标记了这个View设置的监听事件，这里有几个判断条件：
（1）ListenerInfo不为空，而且设置了OnTouchListener监听；
（2）设置了OnTouchListener监听，而且onTouch方法返回了true
这个时候，result设置为true；
核心代码2：如果满足了核心代码1的全部条件，那么核心代码2就不会走到onTouchEvent这个判断条件中，因为result = true不满足条件直接break。
那么如果设置了OnTouchListener监听，而且onTouch方法返回了false，那么result = false，核心代码2就能够执行onTouchEvent方法，我们看下这个方法实现。
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
//......
if (clickable || (viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
if ((viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
handleTooltipUp();
}
if (!clickable) {
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
}
boolean prepressed = (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PREPRESSED) != 0;
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0 || prepressed) {
// take focus if we don't have it already and we should in
// touch mode.
boolean focusTaken = false;
if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
focusTaken = requestFocus();
}
if (prepressed) {
// The button is being released before we actually
// showed it as pressed. Make it show the pressed
// state now (before scheduling the click) to ensure
// the user sees it.
setPressed(true, x, y);
}
if (!mHasPerformedLongPress && !mIgnoreNextUpEvent) {
// This is a tap, so remove the longpress check
removeLongPressCallback();
// Only perform take click actions if we were in the pressed state
if (!focusTaken) {
// Use a Runnable and post this rather than calling
// performClick directly. This lets other visual state
// of the view update before click actions start.
if (mPerformClick == null) {
mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
}
if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
performClickInternal();
}
}
}
if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
}
if (prepressed) {
postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,
ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
} else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
// If the post failed, unpress right now
mUnsetPressedState.run();
}
removeTapCallback();
}
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
if (event.getSource() == InputDevice.SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN) {
mPrivateFlags3 |= PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
if (!clickable) {
checkForLongClick(
ViewConfiguration.getLongPressTimeout(),
x,
y,
TOUCH_GESTURE_CLASSIFIED__CLASSIFICATION__LONG_PRESS);
break;
}
if (performButtonActionOnTouchDown(event)) {
break;
}
// Walk up the hierarchy to determine if we're inside a scrolling container.
boolean isInScrollingContainer = isInScrollingContainer();
// For views inside a scrolling container, delay the pressed feedback for
// a short period in case this is a scroll.
if (isInScrollingContainer) {
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
if (mPendingCheckForTap == null) {
mPendingCheckForTap = new CheckForTap();
}
mPendingCheckForTap.x = event.getX();
mPendingCheckForTap.y = event.getY();
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout());
} else {
// Not inside a scrolling container, so show the feedback right away
setPressed(true, x, y);
checkForLongClick(
ViewConfiguration.getLongPressTimeout(),
x,
y,
TOUCH_GESTURE_CLASSIFIED__CLASSIFICATION__LONG_PRESS);
}
break;
//----------注意这里的返回值，clickable为true----------//
return true;
}
//----------注意这里的返回值，clickable为false----------//
return false;
}
这里就是对所有事件的处理，包括但不限于ACTION_DOWN、ACTION_UP，我们需要知道一点就是，View的click事件其实是在ACTION_UP中处理的。我们从上面的源码中可以看出来，在ACTION_UP中有一个方法performClickInternal，具体实现为performClick方法。
public boolean performClick() {
// We still need to call this method to handle the cases where performClick() was called
// externally, instead of through performClickInternal()
notifyAutofillManagerOnClick();
final boolean result;
final ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnClickListener != null) {
playSoundEffect(SoundEffectConstants.CLICK);
li.mOnClickListener.onClick(this);
result = true;
} else {
result = false;
}
sendAccessibilityEvent(AccessibilityEvent.TYPE_VIEW_CLICKED);
notifyEnterOrExitForAutoFillIfNeeded(true);
return result;
}
在这个方法中，我们貌似看到同样的一段代码，如果设置了OnClickListener监听，那么就会执行onClick方法也就是响应点击事件。
所以通过上面的分析，我们能够了解，如果同一个View同时设置了setOnClickListener和setOnTouchListener，如果setOnTouchListener返回了false，那么点击事件是可以响应的；如果setOnTouchListener返回了true，那么点击事件将不再响应。
binding.tvHello.setOnClickListener {
Log.e("TAG","OnClick")
}
binding.tvHello.setOnTouchListener(object : View.OnTouchListener{
override fun onTouch(v: View?, event: MotionEvent?): Boolean {
Log.e("TAG","onTouch")
return false
}
})
还需要注意一点的就是，对于clickable这个属性要求非常严格，必须要设置为true才可以进行事件的消费，也就是说在clickable为true的时候，onTouchEvent才会返回true，否则就会返回false，这个DOWN事件没有被消费，也就是说在dispatchTransformedTouchEvent方法中返回了false，此时就不会给 mFirstTouchTraget == null 赋值，后续MOVE事件进来就不会处理，这里需要非常注意。
这里伙伴们如果不理解，可以换句话说：就是当DOWN事件来临之后，其实ViewGroup一定会将事件分发给子View，看子View要不要消费，如果子View不是clickable的，也就是说clickable = false，那么此时子View的onTouchEvent返回false，那么dispatchTouchEvent也是返回false，代表子View不消费这个事件，那么此时dispatchTransformedTouchEvent也是返回了false，mFirstTouchTraget还是空；因为子View没有消费DOWN事件，那么后续事件不会再触发了。
1.3 ViewGroup的事件分发 -- ACTION_DOWN
前面我们介绍了View对于事件的消费，不管是click还是touch，都有对应的标准决定是否能够响应事件，最终View的dispatchTouchEvent返回值，就是result的值，只要有一个事件被消费，那么这个事件就算是到头了，但是，如果最终事件没有被消费，也就是说dispatchTouchEvent返回了false，那么父容器就能够拿到这个状态，决定谁去处理这个事件。
所以ViewGroup就像是荷官，卡牌就是事件，她可以决定牌发到谁的手里，所以ViewGroup的事件分发机制核心就在于dispatchTouchEvent方法。
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
// ......
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(ev)) {
final int action = ev.getAction();
final int actionMasked = action & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK;
// Handle an initial down.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.
// The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture
// due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
}
// Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
// If intercepted, start normal event dispatch. Also if there is already
// a view that is handling the gesture, do normal event dispatch.
if (intercepted || mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
// Check for cancelation.
final boolean canceled = resetCancelNextUpFlag(this)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL;
// Update list of touch targets for pointer down, if needed.
final boolean isMouseEvent = ev.getSource() == InputDevice.SOURCE_MOUSE;
final boolean split = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_SPLIT_MOTION_EVENTS) != 0
&& !isMouseEvent;
TouchTarget newTouchTarget = null;
boolean alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = false;
// -------- 这里是不拦截的时候会走的地方 -------//
if (!canceled && !intercepted) {
// If the event is targeting accessibility focus we give it to the
// view that has accessibility focus and if it does not handle it
// we clear the flag and dispatch the event to all children as usual.
// We are looking up the accessibility focused host to avoid keeping
// state since these events are very rare.
View childWithAccessibilityFocus = ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()
? findChildWithAccessibilityFocus() : null;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down
final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)
: TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS;
// Clean up earlier touch targets for this pointer id in case they
// have become out of sync.
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign);
final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x =
isMouseEvent ? ev.getXCursorPosition() : ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y =
isMouseEvent ? ev.getYCursorPosition() : ev.getY(actionIndex);
// Find a child that can receive the event.
// Scan children from front to back.
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
// If there is a view that has accessibility focus we want it
// to get the event first and if not handled we will perform a
// normal dispatch. We may do a double iteration but this is
// safer given the timeframe.
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
}
if (!child.canReceivePointerEvents()
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
}
resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
// The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
}
if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
}
}
//-------------这里是拦截之后会走的地方-------------//
// Dispatch to touch targets.
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
}
// Update list of touch targets for pointer up or cancel, if needed.
if (canceled
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
resetTouchState();
} else if (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_UP) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex();
final int idBitsToRemove = 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex);
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToRemove);
}
}
if (!handled && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(ev, 1);
}
return handled;
}
1.1.1 万事皆始于ACTION_DOWN
看着dispatchTouchEvent这么长的代码，是不是脑袋都昏了，我给伙伴们分下层，首先一切的事件分发都是从ACTION_DOWN事件开始，所以我们可以看下ACTION_DOWN事件是如何处理的。
核心代码1：
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
当ACTION_DWON事件来了之后，首先调用ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent方法，在上面这段代码中，就是判断ViewGroup是否要拦截这个事件，如果DOWN事件都被拦截了，就没有小弟的份了。
所以如果当前是DOWN事件，或者mFirstTouchTarget不为空。首先这里有一个变量mFirstTouchTarget，我们可以认为这个就是可能会消费事件的View，因为首次肯定为空，但是当前为DOWN事件，所以这个条件是满足的，那么就会进入到代码块中。
在代码块中，有一个disallowIntercept变量，这个变量标志着子View是否需要消费这个事件，如果需要消费这个事件，子View可以调用requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent这个方法，设置为true，那么父容器就不会拦截。
所以如果子View需要消费这个事件，那么disallowIntercept = true，这个时候intercepted = false，意味着父容器不会拦截；如果子View不消费这个事件，那么disallowIntercept = false，然后会判断ViewGroup中的onInterceptTouchEvent方法，是否由父容器消费这个事件从而决定intercepted的值。
所以看到这里，其实我们在解决事件冲突的时候就会有两种方式：一种就是重写父容器的onInterceptTouchEvent方法，由父容器决定是否拦截；另一种就是由子View调用requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent方法，通知父容器是否能够拦截。
那么假设，当前ViewGroup要拦截这个事件，也就是在onInterceptTouchEvent中返回了true
override fun onInterceptTouchEvent(ev: MotionEvent?): Boolean {
return true
}
1.1.2 ViewGroup拦截事件
那么既然拦截了事件，那么当前ViewGroup就需要决定到底处不处理事件，如果不处理就需要向上传递。
因为ViewGroup拦截了事件，因此intercepted = true，在1.3开头的代码中，我标记了2个位置，一个是拦截会走的位置，一个是没有拦截会走的位置。
核心代码2：
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
}
因为这个时候，mFirstTouchTarget还是为空的，所以会调用dispatchTransformedTouchEvent方法。
private boolean dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(MotionEvent event, boolean cancel,
View child, int desiredPointerIdBits) {
final boolean handled;
// ......
// Perform any necessary transformations and dispatch.
if (child == null) {
handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(transformedEvent);
} else {
final float offsetX = mScrollX - child.mLeft;
final float offsetY = mScrollY - child.mTop;
transformedEvent.offsetLocation(offsetX, offsetY);
if (! child.hasIdentityMatrix()) {
transformedEvent.transform(child.getInverseMatrix());
}
handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(transformedEvent);
}
// Done.
transformedEvent.recycle();
return handled;
}
这时候需要注意一点，这个方法第三个参数为null； 所以当child为空的时候，就会调用父类的dispatchTouchEvent，也就是View的dispatchTouchEvent方法，在1.2小节中我们是对这个方法做过分析的，也是会决定是否处理这个事件，最终返回是否处理的结果。
所以这一次的结果（handled的值）最终决定了当前ViewGroup是否会处理这个事件，如果不处理，那么就扔到上级再判断。
1.1.3 ViewGroup不拦截事件
如果ViewGroup不拦截事件，那么intercepted = false，所以会走到分发事件的代码中。
核心代码3：
if (!canceled && !intercepted) {
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down
final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)
: TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS;
// Clean up earlier touch targets for this pointer id in case they
// have become out of sync.
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign);
final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x =
isMouseEvent ? ev.getXCursorPosition() : ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y =
isMouseEvent ? ev.getYCursorPosition() : ev.getY(actionIndex);
// Find a child that can receive the event.
// Scan children from front to back.
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
//----------遍历集合，从后往前取------------//
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
// If there is a view that has accessibility focus we want it
// to get the event first and if not handled we will perform a
// normal dispatch. We may do a double iteration but this is
// safer given the timeframe.
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
}
//-----判断View是否有消费的可能性---------//
if (!child.canReceivePointerEvents()
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
}
resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
//-------- 这个方法需要注意，第三个参数不为空----------//
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
// The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
}
if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
}
}
这里首先会判断事件是否为down事件，只有down事件才会分发，如果是move或者up事件便不会分发。所以伙伴们需要牢记一点，如果在某个控件上产生了up事件，即便是设置了onClickListener，因为没有接收到down事件，所以也不会响应点击事件。
然后调用buildTouchDispatchChildList方法，对当前ViewGroup全部的子View根据Z轴顺序排序，
ArrayList<View> buildOrderedChildList() {
final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (childrenCount <= 1 || !hasChildWithZ()) return null;
if (mPreSortedChildren == null) {
mPreSortedChildren = new ArrayList<>(childrenCount);
} else {
// callers should clear, so clear shouldn't be necessary, but for safety...
mPreSortedChildren.clear();
mPreSortedChildren.ensureCapacity(childrenCount);
}
final boolean customOrder = isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
for (int i = 0; i < childrenCount; i++) {
// add next child (in child order) to end of list
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View nextChild = mChildren[childIndex];
final float currentZ = nextChild.getZ();
// insert ahead of any Views with greater Z
int insertIndex = i;
while (insertIndex > 0 && mPreSortedChildren.get(insertIndex - 1).getZ() > currentZ) {
insertIndex--;
}
mPreSortedChildren.add(insertIndex, nextChild);
}
return mPreSortedChildren;
}
这里我们可以看到是按照Z轴值从高到低排序，Z值越大，说明其层级越深，最终拿到一个View的集合。
然后遍历取值的时候，是按照倒序取值的方式，因为Z值越小，说明其层级越浅，事件被消费的概率就越高；取出一个View之后，首先需要判断它是否具备消费事件的可能性。
if (!child.canReceivePointerEvents()
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
第一个条件：View是可见的，或者 getAnimation() != null
protected boolean canReceivePointerEvents() {
return (mViewFlags & VISIBILITY_MASK) == VISIBLE || getAnimation() != null;
}
第二个条件：当前View在点击（x,y）的范围之内，如果离着手指点击的位置很远，肯定不可能消费。
protected boolean isTransformedTouchPointInView(float x, float y, View child,
PointF outLocalPoint) {
final float[] point = getTempLocationF();
point[0] = x;
point[1] = y;
transformPointToViewLocal(point, child);
final boolean isInView = child.pointInView(point[0], point[1]);
if (isInView && outLocalPoint != null) {
outLocalPoint.set(point[0], point[1]);
}
return isInView;
}
所以经过层层筛选，也就只剩下一小部分可能会消费事件的View，那么怎么把他揪出来呢？经过筛选的View最终调用了dispatchTransformedTouchEvent方法，在1.1.2中我们介绍了这个方法，就是用来判断是否消费事件的，这里传入的第三个参数不为空！
回到前面dispatchTransformedTouchEvent方法中，当child不为空的时候，走到else代码块中，最终还是调用了child的dispatchTouchEvent方法。
所以如果当前View消费了DOWN事件，那么返回值为true，也就是dispatchTransformedTouchEvent返回了true，那么会进入下面代码块中。
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
//----- 这里就是给mFirstTouchTarget赋值--------//
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
因为当前child消费了事件，那么我们前面提到的mFirstTouchTarget就是由child封装一层得来的，也就是调用了addTouchTarget方法，也就是说当一个child消费了一个DOWN事件之后，mFirstTouchTarget就不再为空了。
private TouchTarget addTouchTarget(@NonNull View child, int pointerIdBits) {
final TouchTarget target = TouchTarget.obtain(child, pointerIdBits);
target.next = mFirstTouchTarget;
mFirstTouchTarget = target;
return target;
}
如果全部都不处理，那么mFirstTouchTarget还是为空，走到下面还是会执行ViewGroup拦截事件的逻辑，也就是1.1.2中的逻辑，所以说，如果全部的子View都不处理，其实跟ViewGroup拦截事件的本质是一致的。
1.4 ViewGroup的事件分发 -- ACTION_MOVE
前面我们介绍了ViewGroup对于ACTION_DOWN事件的分发处理，因为DOWN事件只有一次，MOVE可以有无数次，所以在处理完DOWN事件之后，就会有MOVE事件涌进来。
所以还是回到前面的判断条件中，我们对于MOVE事件的分发，需要基于DOWN事件的处理；
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
如果ViewGroup拦截了事件：
那么mFirstTouchTarget == null，会走到else中，此时 intercepted = true，那么就会走到ViewGroup拦截逻辑中，会调用dispatchTransformedTouchEvent，第三个参数child == null，那么如果ViewGroup不消费不处理，就会交给上级处理。
如果ViewGroup不拦截事件：
那么mFirstTouchTarget != null，此时还是会判断子View是否拦截该事件，如果拦截，那么intercepted = true，还是会走上面的拦截逻辑；如果不拦截，那么intercepted = false，会走到ViewGroup不拦截事件的逻辑中。
if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
因为只有DOWN事件的时候，才会遍历View树，如果是MOVE事件，不会进入循环，不再分发，而是走上面的逻辑，此时newTouchTarget == null 而且 mFirstTouchTarget不为空，此时会给newTouchTarget重新赋值，然后继续往下走。
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
}
因为mFirstTouchTarget != null，因此会走到else代码块中，因为alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget是在事件分发时才赋值为true，所以在while循环中（一次循环，单点触控），会走else代码块，其实还是会调用dispatchTransformedTouchEvent方法判断是否处理事件，所以这就形成了一条责任链，当一个View消费了DOWN事件之后，后续的事件系统默认都会给他消费，除非特殊情况。
2 Android事件冲突处理
基于Android事件分发机制，DOWN事件只会执行一次，而且只是做分发工作，而MOVE事件会有无数次，所以对于事件冲突来说，只能在MOVE事件中进行处理。
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
针对这种分发机制，前面也提到了两种处理方式，要么在父容器的onInterceptTouchEvent中判断是否拦截事件，要么控制disallowIntercept的值，所以就出现了2种拦截法。
2.1 内部拦截法
此方式指的是在子View中，通过控制disallowIntercept的值，来让父容器决定是否拦截事件。
class MotionEventLayout(
val mContext: Context,
val attrs: AttributeSet? = null,
val defStyleAttr: Int = 0
) : FrameLayout(mContext, attrs, defStyleAttr) {
override fun onInterceptTouchEvent(ev: MotionEvent?): Boolean {
return true
}
}
如果在父容器的onInterceptTouchEvent方法中返回true，那么down一定会被拦截而不会分发给子View，所以子View不会响应任何事件。
class MotionEventChildLayout(
val mContext: Context,
val attrs: AttributeSet? = null,
val defStyleAttr: Int = 0
) : FrameLayout(mContext, attrs, defStyleAttr) {
private var startX = 0
private var startY = 0
override fun dispatchTouchEvent(ev: MotionEvent?): Boolean {
when (ev?.action) {
MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN -> {
//不能被拦截
parent.requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(true)
}
MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE -> {
var endX = ev.rawX
var endY = ev.rawY
//竖向滑动
if (abs(endX - startX) > abs(endY - startY)) {
parent.requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent(false)
}
startX = endX
startY = endY
}
}
return super.dispatchTouchEvent(ev)
}
}
所以使用内部拦截法时，对于DOWN事件不能被拦截，需要将requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent设置为true，这样父容器在分发事件时，就不会走自身的onInterceptTouchEvent方法（此时无论设置true或者false都是无效的），intercepted = false，此时事件就会被分发到子View。
然后在滑动时，如果父容器支持左右滑动，子View支持上下滑动，那么就可以判断：如果横向滑动的距离大于竖直方向滑动的距离，任务在左右滑动，此时事件处理交给父容器处理；反之则交给子View处理。
这是我们理解中的处理方式，看着好像没问题，但是实际运行时发现无效！！ 我们明明设置了requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent为true，为什么没生效呢？
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.
// The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture
// due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
}
通过源码我们发现，当DOWN事件触发之后，会清除所有的标志位，包括disallowIntercept，所以在使用内部拦截法的时候，我们需要保证外部容器不能拦截DOWN事件，其实这个不会有问题的，大不了所有的子View都不处理，最终再扔给你处理。
override fun onInterceptTouchEvent(ev: MotionEvent?): Boolean {
if (ev?.action == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
super.onInterceptTouchEvent(ev)
return false
}
return true
}
所以在父容器的onInterceptTouchEvent方法中，不能对DOWN事件进行拦截，这里返回了false。
因为父容器没有拦截down事件，所以事件被分发给了子View（可以上下滑动），紧接着MOVE事件来了，全部交给了子View处理，这时的mFirstTouchTarget还是子View的。如果用户手势改成了左右滑动，那么这个过程两者是如何完成转换的呢？
此时，mFirstTouchTarget != null，action == MOVE，disallowIntercept = false，因为是move事件，所有标志位不会被清除，此时会走到这里。
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
}
此时，父容器的onInterceptTouchEvent返回的是true，要拦截子View的事件了，此时intercepted = true，因为mFirstTouchTarget != null，所以在拦截逻辑里，是会走到else代码块中的。
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
因为这个时候 intercepted = true，所以cancelChild = true，所以在dispatchTransformedTouchEvent方法中，第二个参数为true。
private boolean dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(MotionEvent event, boolean cancel,
View child, int desiredPointerIdBits) {
final boolean handled;
// Canceling motions is a special case. We don't need to perform any transformations
// or filtering. The important part is the action, not the contents.
final int oldAction = event.getAction();
if (cancel || oldAction == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL) {
event.setAction(MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL);
if (child == null) {
handled = super.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
} else {
handled = child.dispatchTouchEvent(event);
}
event.setAction(oldAction);
return handled;
}
}
这时会触发一个ACTION_CANCEL事件，这个事件是子View事件被上层拦截的时候触发的，其实当前这个MOVE事件做的一件事，就是执行了子View的cancel事件，然后将mFirstTouchTarget置为了空；因为MOVE事件很多，所以下个MOVE事件进来之后，又会走到判断是否拦截的逻辑中。
此时父容器会冷酷地拦截这些MOVE事件，原本属于子View的MOVE事件，而且不会往下分发，走到拦截逻辑中，因为此时mFirstTouchTarget为空，所以直接由自身决定是否消费，肯定消费了，因为在左右滑动，也就是这样完成的事件消费处理权的切换。
2.2 外部拦截法
那么对于外部拦截法，则是需要动态修改onInterceptTouchEvent的返回值，如果用户左右滑动，那么就拦截，onInterceptTouchEvent返回true，此时intercepted = true，就不再走事件分发流程了。
class MotionEventLayout(
val mContext: Context,
val attrs: AttributeSet? = null,
val defStyleAttr: Int = 0
) : FrameLayout(mContext, attrs, defStyleAttr) {
private var startX = 0f
private var startY = 0f
override fun onInterceptTouchEvent(ev: MotionEvent?): Boolean {
var intercepted = false
when (ev?.action) {
MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN -> {
}
MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE -> {
val endX = ev.rawX
val endY = ev.rawY
//竖向滑动
intercepted = abs(endX - startX) > abs(endY - startY)
startX = endX
startY = endY
}
}
return intercepted
}
}
相较于内部拦截法，外部拦截就显得比较简单了，完全由父容器发牌决定。
以上就是Android进阶事件分发机制解决事件冲突的详细内容，更多关于Android事件冲突解决的资料请关注脚本之家其它相关文章！